As I mentioned in the last post, this is going to be somewhat of a political blog entry.
I don't like getting political about things but it is unavoidable in this day and age. And I usually will try to be politically neutral on most of my posts. Today though is a different matter.
This post was began on Monday the 11th of January and was immediate paused shortly after. I had just done something that I had been debating on doing for several months prior. I deactivated my Twitter account. Of course, I would wind re-activating it by Wednesday morning so that "Failed Hero" and I would be able to communicate easier about the "Project WWWN" stuff via DM while he is at work. (Being that he is a teacher, he cannot access discord easily (if at all) while he is at work but he can DM via Twitter from his phone easily.) And since I am working on the "Project WWWN" stuff from home and other creative projects at some point since being put on disability then Twitter DM is unfortunately the easiest way to communicate. (True Facebook messenger is technically an option but I don't honestly care for Facebook either.)
This is just a bit of backstory and explanation on the situation. The issue here is Social Media and censorship.
Social media tools have become unfortunate necessities for communication in modern times. And as much as I loathe saying the phrase, it could be argued as something of a necessary evil. And I think it has been argued in a few journals out there as being an addiction or bordering on one at the least. It has also become something dangerous that I believe will even get more dangerous in the coming days.
For starters, Social Media has created a society that, despite its denials, has glamorized hate and even made it seem cool. It has made ostracization of others fashionable. It has also made hypocrisy the norm. Need proof? Go back and look at how many people in 2016 after the election were spewing hateful comments toward Trump, his family and Trump voters while also saying "#LoveTrumpsHate" and similar hashtags. Want more? Look how many of those people were "punished" for hateful rhetoric when reported on Twitter when reported for hate rhetoric and harassing other users.
In the past four years, Social Media has also made censorship completely acceptable... as long as it is the censoring of those of whom one group or another disagrees. And I don't believe that I am too far off base when I say that the people running social media platforms "relish" in the power that they now have in this regard to decide "who gets Free Speech" and "who doesn't get Free Speech". (Spoiler Alert: FREE SPEECH IS A RIGHT UNDER THE US CONSTITUTION. Another spoiler: JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE SAYS SOMETHING YOU DISAGREE WITH DOESN'T MAKE IT HATE.)
These people, who I guess are not being called "Big Tech" have spawned something called the "Cancel Culture" movement that is little more than "angry mobs taking to the digital streets" if someone so much as says they are not a fan of "K-pop" much less anything political. And the people running these social media sites? Several of them have flat out lied before Congress without any sort of repercussions. And don't even get me started on the alleged behavior of Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and that behavior's relationship to the late Jeffery Epstein. (Oh and for the record: EPSTEIN DIDN'T KILL HIMSELF. And if you think it was Trump's folks that killed him then you are not paying attention... or perhaps a few other things I can think of. There were enough names political and otherwise and Trump's name was not even on the flight log. And not to sound like a conspiracy nut or anything but there's at least five other "celebrity deaths" in recent years that I find the details of to be suspicious. Four of them were ruled suicide.)
But enough about that... especially the bit of a tangent in the last paragraph.
I use to like Twitter. It was a great tool as it was originally presented. One could post updates on creative projects, link to information, post humorous observations about the day. (If I am being honest, Facebook was not bad when it began either. (Though... I still miss the original Myspace for a variety of reasons.) Somewhere along the way, Twitter mutated into the monstrosity that it is today.
At some point, the "trending topics" started churning out assorted rhetoric that encouraged hate. And then people discovered how the "trending topics" could be manipulated and they used that to put forth all sorts of other hateful rhetoric. And all of this was before the 2016 election. All of this was before Donald Trump beat Hilary Clinton.
Point #1: As a post I saw on Instagram pointed out: The election of Donald Trump didn't create the hate and division we now have in this country not to mention around the world... it revealed it.
In 2012, a bill labeled as HR4310 was signed into law which basically "allows the use of propaganda to be used on US Citizens". It effectively repealed the "Smith-Mundt Act of 1948" which banned the use of propaganda on domestic soil. And while it is quite easy to argue that propaganda has been used anyway since the 1948 law, especially by those who do not have a full understanding of what propaganda is, the HR4310 cleared the path for there to be NO potential ramifications for what happens next just in case things got called into question.
It also allowed for a few other things. It allowed for the media to dishonestly cover events like the Boston marathon bombing in 2013, the Fort Hood shooting in 2014, the San Bernardino Massacre 2015, the Orlando Nightclub Shooting 2016. The Vegas Shooting in 2017. and don't forget the various school shootings. Now before you get the wrong idea, like you haven't already, allow me to clarify something: the dishonest covering likely varied in all these cases. The common denominator in all cases was the use of these events in the dissemination of propaganda during the course of the "media coverage" and since then.
For those of you who don't quite understand what propaganda is:
Propaganda (from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.)
1) The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause.
2) Material disseminated by the advocates or opponents of a doctrine or cause.
And as much of that propaganda was disseminated via social media as via the traditional mainstream media coverage. Often times, it was mainstream media outlets using social media as well as various parties who were admitted "advocates" and "activists" for various causes.
Consider this: HR4310 being signed into law was the beginning of the problems we now have with "Big Tech" and the onslaught of both sides decreeing "FAKE NEWS" at the top of their lungs. It essentially gave the media the ability to lie about the news and not face repercussions. Social media gave them the means to do it with ease and to manipulate the public into helping spread the lies as truths.
Point #2: You are being manipulated. That manipulation is usually happening through you emotions being manipulated. This manipulation has been on various fronts. You have been coaxed into accepting lies that made you feel good rather that unpleasant truths that might be a bit uncomfortable. And then your feelings have been manipulated and that has led to you being mentally manipulated. They have banked on your cognitive dissonance kicking in at the slightest suggestion that you have been misled into believing some various lies.
Consider this: Malcom X is quoted as saying "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." He wasn't far off the mark. He might have amended that statement had he seen what's come about in recent years. I mean we have generations of youths and young adults who believe they are oppressed because they hear a word that offends them. Being oppressed is not hearing a word that offends you or having someone disagree with you. Oppression is being told that you can not say something for fear that you will offend someone else. After all... "in order to think, one has to risk being offensive." (paraphrased from Jordan Peterson.)
Final Point: I am going to leave you with a few "meme" images I snagged from Instagram. Just a few last things to consider.



